drawings of muscles and exercise apparatus

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Some thoughts on engagement under the new rugby scrum law

An email I received from Colin Astley reads:

"With the new scrum engagement rules everybody's looking for that little something to get the advantage. What are your views on my theory that if you use a quick 'squat' on the engage call, this would give you that extra 'bang' and you would be coming in at a rising angle. As there is only a split second to utilise this technique, the player would have to train the stretch-shortening of the muscle.

"Look forward to your thoughts,


I think that Colin is really onto something significant here. What we are observing under the new rules is a tendency to revert to the practice of the No. 8 pulling back on the locks while the referee goes through his " Crouch - Touch - Pause - Engage" chant. On "Engage" the No. 8 pushes with straightened arms against the buttocks of the locks before attempting to wedge his head between the locks' hips.

Prior to the "Engage" the front seven of the pack are pulling forward or leaning forward against the restraint of the No. 8. Once that brake is released they are pitched forward. Apart from the difficulty of coordinating the transmission and timing of force through the three rows of players, there are other problems from a biomechanical viewpoint.

In conventional scrummaging, front rowers typically crouch so that they maintain a stable position while being positioned to generate a powerful shove. By contrast, if they are being pulled backward their natural tendency is to adopt a very different body configuration. They will be more erect, and in particular their hips will be higher. That is what seems to be happening since the introduction of the new law - front rows are falling forward into the engagement with a consequent increase in collapses and resets.

I think that Colin has not thought through issues of timing when he suggests "a quick 'squat' on the engage call". That is far too late in the sequence. However, if around the time of the "Pause" call all forwards crouch or sink, they will be in an ideal position to rapidly generate a cohesive and coordinated upward-slanting shove on the "Engage". The structured and measured sequencing of the referee's calls under the new law makes such a technique very feasible.

What Colin is talking about when he refers to "stretch-shortening" is a phenomenon utilised by jumpers and gymnasts to increase jumping height and also observable in the ballistic back swing or pre-stretch of throwers and racquet game players:

"The stretch-shorten cycle (SSC) describes a period in which a muscle undergoes eccentric work, is stretched, contracts isometrically to stop the counter movement, and follows immediately with maximal contraction with the intention of applying a maximal force. The cycle utilises the principle of stretch reflex, of the length-tension relationship of muscle, storage of elastic energy in the muscle-tendon complex, enhanced potentiation of muscle, and chemical energy from the preload effect." (Doug McClymont and Mike Cron, "Total impact method: a variation on engagement technique in the rugby scrum" http://www.coachesinfo.com/category/rugby/84/)

There is absolutely no doubt that a pack which is trained to utilise stretch-shortening from a low crouch position will generate much more effective and purposeful force than one that one that adopts the "pull-back-then-release-the-brakes" method.

I believe that the new scrum law is potentially a significant improvement, subject to two conditions. Firstly, referees must rigidly enforce Law 20.2 (b) which requires of front rowers that "each player's shoulders must be no lower than the hips". Secondly, the practice of No. 8s pulling back the pack should be outlawed as it has been clearly demonstrated that its effect is directly contrary to the primary intent of the new law, i.e., to produce safer engagements and to minimise resets.


colin astley said...

thanks bruce for putting my email up for discussion.i wanted to see what the academics thought has iam just a simple front-rower.i've never put it into pratice it's just a theory i came up with during a weights session.
looking forward to the comments.

Wayne Knoesen said...

Hi there

I just found your blog and i will be sowing it to my rugby team here in Sweden (www.redsaintsrugby.com) got some good tip for our training. I was also wondering if you would like to exchange links. I have a blog http://www.rugbyworldcupblog.com Let me know if you would like to trade links.

Frankie said...

Hey guys, I'm really looking forward to the Tri Nations Series. I was looking around the web for a place to watch rugby online (I'm in the US, no rugby on TV here), and I found this great site with a blog.

The blog is - http://mediazonerugby.typepad.com/

Streamed Rugby is - http://www.mediazone.com/channel/rugby/jsp/2006/trinations.jsp\ Check it out guys.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Jhon Amstrong said...

Nice blog and good content...
have a nice day

Muzic Blast, Free MP3, Free Music, Download mp3
All about music, you can download mp3, view lyrics, get ringtone, and many more feature for your fun. Try


Mr.galle said...

Hello, this site is nice!!
I already link to this page.
If you don't mind. Please link to my blog this URL

Nursedude said...

There really were a lot of collapsed scrums last week at Twickenham, weren't there? And the footing looked to be decent. I don't know, I think the quality of the ref helps the pack a great deal, as well. At least my experience has been, I like the newer Crouch, touch, pause, engage set of commands. I think one of the key things to come out of any studies will be has the rate of injuries to front rowers in the scrums gone down? If so, it has all been for the good.

Nursedude said...

Frankie, I am in the USA, like you.(Minnesota) If you can get either Direct TV or Dish Network, you can order the channel Setanta Sports, and you will be able to see all kinds of rugby on that.(as well as soccer, Gaelic football, Aussie rules footy, among other sports)

Bruce Ross said...

ND, with regard to your comment on the match at Twickenham, it was quite bizarre to watch so many scrums having to be reset in the first half. There was one, perhaps in the second half, where Andy Sheridan ended up flat on his face stretched out on the ground indicating that his feet had lost purchase on the turf. The number of times that players across the field lose their footing these days would suggest that longer sprigs might be worth trying.

It is decades since I put my head into a scrum but it looked to me as if the two packs were starting a bit too far apart. But I keep coming back to my hobby horse - If you start from a deep crouch your shoulders are automatically higher than your hips meaning that it is unlikely you will pitch forward. You should be able to tell me. What's with this reluctance to crouch? Is it laziness, poor technique, or are players coached just to bend at the waist?

Nursedude said...

I think it's poor or lazy technique, Bruce. I know my coach on my team-interestingly an aussie prop, himself-was the one who taught me about balancing my chest on a Swiss exercise ball, and to practice exploding multiple sets with that. I felt like it helped me with my scrum technique a great deal. (I also think the kettlebell training helped my explosiveness portion) I agree with you that I think the ref had them starting too far from each other at Twickers.

Bruce Ross said...

The use of the Swiss exercise ball sounds interesting, ND. It's not something I've come across before. But it appears a logical reaction to the fact that the process of scrum engagement is an essentially unstable dynamic situation.