drawings of muscles and exercise apparatus

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Building bigger and stronger rugby players - the Sydney University experiment

It is widely acknowledged that the average bodyweight of rugby players has increased considerably over recent years. Less recognised is the extent to which modern defensive alignments and strategies have transformed rugby matches into contests of attrition where bigger and stronger teams tend to wear down their smaller and physically weaker opponents over the course of a game. Perhaps the most notable change has been the increased importance of physical dominance in the backline.


Responding to this, Sydney University's rugby club has been able to demonstrate that with the right combination of coach and infrastructure, it is possible to fast track the physical development of players outside a professional playing environment. In fact within a couple of seasons these players are able to achieve a body mass comparable to that of seasoned professionals together with a solid foundation of basic strength.


In late May, Sydney University announced its team for the first round of the Tooheys New Cup, the premier competition in Sydney club rugby. All of the fifteen players are past or current students who had been developed through the Club's Colts and lower grade teams. None of them are paid to play for the Club, although the eleven who are still students receive modest scholarship assistance. Only three of the players are on professional contracts.


It is instructive to compare their bodyweight and age profiles with those of squads from four major rugby countries:




TeamAverage Weight (kg)Average Age
Wallabies - 2006 Squad102.626.1
All Blacks - 2006 Squad102.925.5
Springboks - 2006 Squad102.226.8
England - 2006 6 Nations Squad101.227.2
Sydney University - 2006 Tooheys New Cup Team100.522.5

Comparative Bodyweight and Age Profiles


It can be seen that the part-time, unpaid Sydney University players, though three to five years younger, weigh only a couple of kilograms less than the world's best players. This is quite extraordinary as normally a much greater weight disparity would be expected.


For the past three years Sydney University Football Club has been operating an Elite Development Squad (EDS) program for its top grade and colts players. Utilising one of the best equipped gymnasiums in Australian rugby, players train for eleven months of the year and undertake four weights sessions per week off-season and a lesser number while playing.


The program's strength and conditioning components have been devised and administered by Martin Harland, a sports scientist who has previously worked with professional rugby league, Australian football and basketball teams. His programs for rugby players place a high degree of emphasis on basic strength development and rugby-specific fitness. A distinguishing feature of his approach is a concentration on heavy lower body work through exercises such as squats, deadlifts and cleans. In addition, both backs and forwards make intensive use of the MyoQuip ScrumTruk, a rugby-specific apparatus that targets the large mass leg extensor muscles, specifically the gluteal and quadriceps groups. Hypertrophy or increased muscle mass is a natural and not unintended by-product of such training.


Exposing backline players to basic strength training


Another distinctive feature of Martin Harland's rugby training regimen is his requirement that backs undertake the same rigorous basic strength routines as forwards. Many strength and conditioning coaches reserve the heavy "grunt" work for forwards, or even restrict it to the tight five.


Exposing backs to very serious weight training has produced a quite extraordinary outcome at Sydney University, as evidenced by the following table comparing body weights of forwards and backs for the Wallabies, the four Australian Super 14 franchises and Sydney University:



Squad/Team (2006) Av Weight (kg) - ForwardsAv Weight (kg) - BacksDifference
Wallabies - Squad111.191.819.3
ACT Brumbies - Squad110.390.919.4
NSW Waratahs - Squad110.892.818.0
Queensland Reds - Squad109.792.417.3
Western Force - Squad109.192.916.2
Sydney University - Team105.395.110.2

Comparative Bodyweight of Forwards and Backs


Not surprisingly, the University's young forwards are outweighed by each of the five professional squads. However, in the backs the situation is reversed. The University players outweigh the national and provincial squads by between 2.2 and 4.2 kg per man.


If we look at the column showing the difference in bodyweight between backs and forwards it can be seen that for Sydney University it averages 10.2 kg, against 16.2 to 19.4 kg for Australia's professional squads, a very substantial difference.


The Sydney University experiment seems to be providing clear evidence that the bodyweight of rugby backs can be dramatically increased through serious weight training, but the question arises as to whether this has benefits in terms of playing performance.


One answer is that the other strength-oriented football code, American football, has traditionally used training methods similar to those of Martin Harland. All players, whether linemen or running backs, are required to do heavy gym work. Surely no one would seriously suggest that their quick players have inferior dynamic abilities to rugby players.


Another justification for building heavier backs with superior leg drive lies in the already mentioned importance of physical dominance in the rugby backline. With the modern emphasis on structure and coordination in defensive alignments, bigger and stronger backs are better able to continually repel opposition attacks and also over the course of a game are likely to create physical and mental fatigue in their counterparts.


Having achieved a strong foundation of basic strength and greater body mass, Martin Harland is then able to focus on speed and explosiveness in his players. It is clear that the Sydney University approach yields results on the playing field. 2005 was the Club's most successful year, winning the Sydney Club Championship, the First Grade Premiership and four lower grade Premierships.


Even more importantly, players who graduate from such a program are much better equipped to withstand the rigours of modern rugby.














12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi Bruce
I suppose that Rugby is similar to American Football. There has been a very clear trend over the years to biggger, stronger and faster rugby players. Athough this has often been achieved through steriods. I dont hope that this trend will increase because otherwise you will see more and more young players using steriods to traying to "compete" with the big boys.

Bonesmasher Rugby Gear
www.bonesmasher.com

Anonymous said...

Hi, is there any chance to get more info about the program that this university is running?
Thanks in advance

Gustavo

Bruce Ross said...

Thanks for the comment, Bonesmasher. One of the good things about what is being done at Sydney University is that it demonstrates that very significant gains in size and strength can be achieved through the application of activity-specific apparatus and exercises and, in particular, programs based on sound biomechanical principles. That being so, there should be less temptation to resort to unethical and dangerous practices.

I think that your comparison of rugby to American football is very apt. The American code systematically develops players with high body mass and strength without sacrificing mobility or athleticism. Rugby in the professional era is trending in the same direction.

Thus far, Gustavo, my two sites are the only real source of information on the innovative sporting development programs at Sydney University. If ever you are in Sydney, I suggest you call out to the University and talk to Martin Harland and the Director of Rugby, Damien Hill.

Martin is also working with elite athletes in other sports such as rowers, women basketballers, and soccer players. Fortunately, he makes extensive use of MyoQuip machines in these programs also.

Regards
Bruce

Anonymous said...

Thanks bruce for the reply.
Sidney is a little far away from argentina :-D, as I'm a "kinesiologo" I think the translation is Physical therapist, and a rugby player as well, this kind of info is just to interesting to me.
Any way, I let my email and msn so if you have any kind of newsletter or info about rugby and biomecanics or similar, and isn't much trouble, you can contact me.

billbody at gmail.com ( email )
billbody1 at hotmail.com ( msn )

Ps hope you can read my english

Bruce Ross said...

I have no problem with your English at all, Gustavo. I will try to forward any items that I think may be of interest to you.

Regards
Bruce

Anonymous said...

Thanks in advance

Gustavo

corhona said...

I have recently been reading some of your blog posts and how found interest in your post and your blogging experience.

I have sent along a more formal email addressing my interest and asking for your participation in non-formal interview that I would like to conduct as part of my MBA dissertation research.

I hope that we can be in contact soon.
Regards

Rhona

Bruce Ross said...

Rhona

I would be more than happy to participate in what is certainly an interesting, topical and potentially important area of research.

Regards
Bruce

Nick said...

Bruce

Fantastic article, I really appreciate this. We are having a lot of media currently going on about reducing players size to make then quicker in South Africa. This mostly due to the lack of success of the big Springbok team. What few seam to realise is that speed and power and strength are all interrelated.

I'm very pleased to see that the university backs average above 100kg. Which is definitely in line with some of our previous discussions on this blog.

Do you have any of there other training parameters, like vertical jump, 10, 20, 30 and 40m sprint times and the like. I'd be interested, because if those measurables also improved (or stayed the same with the mass increase) then that would end most argument.

Can I ask the Ruggaworld guys to publish your article?

Anonymous said...

This is a great resource please consider using our article distribution and submission service

kaj said...

hi,

great article ! and i totally agree with you, just take a look at players like mortlock, luke mcalister etc...,
I think that the weights sessions should be tough for the backs to, but especially focused on legs, squats , calf raises , hack squats etc.... do you agree that backs should focus on their calves ? wich is good for that explosive speed....?

cheers,
kaj

Bruce Ross said...

Thanks for the comment, kaj. The Sydney Uni First Fifteen is playing in another Grand Final tomorrow, after which I intend to post an update. There is also some very interesting body weight data on the University's First Colts (Under 21) and Under 19s which I will include.

Apart from scrumming and mauling I see very little difference between the strength and speed requirements for backs and forwards in the modern game, so I agree with you on the need for backs to do tough weight sessions.

I also agree that the calves, which are often neglected in footballers' weights programs, are very important as a source of explosive power. One of the advantages of the ScrumTruk over say the squat is that the plantar flexors of the calves are strongly activated at the same time as the thigh and hip extensors.

Regards
Bruce